Table of Contents
- Introduction: Two Technology Companies, Two Distinct Growth Stories
- Apple Reports Record September-Quarter Revenue
- Palantir Q3 2026 Earnings Show Accelerating AI Demand
- Palantir Profitability, Cash Flow, and Financial Position
- Palantir Raises Its 2026 Financial Outlook
- Apple and Palantir Earnings: Two Different Technology Growth Models
- What the Results Could Mean for the Technology Sector
- Key Risks and Considerations for Apple and Palantir
- Apple and Palantir: What to Monitor in the Coming Quarters
- Conclusion: Apple and Palantir Reflect Different Opportunities in Technology
Introduction: Two Technology Companies, Two Distinct Growth Stories
Apple and Palantir earnings provide an important perspective on the evolving technology sector, highlighting two companies operating in different markets but benefiting from significant developments in technology adoption, customer demand, and artificial intelligence.
Apple reported record September-quarter revenue of $114.5 billion for its fiscal fourth quarter ended September 26, 2026. The company also recorded September-quarter highs for iPhone revenue and earnings per share, while Services revenue reached a new all-time high. Its results capped a fiscal year in which total revenue reached $479 billion.
Palantir Technologies, meanwhile, reported third-quarter 2026 revenue of $2.313 billion, representing year-over-year growth of 96%. The company’s U.S. commercial business expanded particularly rapidly, with revenue increasing 148% compared with the same period a year earlier. U.S. commercial revenue also surpassed U.S. government revenue for the first time in Palantir’s history.
The two companies illustrate different ways technology businesses can generate growth.
Apple’s business is built around a broad consumer technology ecosystem that includes the iPhone, iPad, Mac, wearables, and Services. Its financial performance reflects consumer demand, product innovation, customer loyalty, and the ability to generate recurring revenue through its installed base.
Palantir operates in enterprise software, government technology, and artificial intelligence. Its business focuses on helping organizations integrate data, manage operational complexity, and deploy AI systems within their existing workflows.
The latest Apple and Palantir earnings reports therefore offer insight into two important areas of technology investment: consumer hardware and digital services on one side, and enterprise AI adoption on the other.
The results also highlight differences in financial scale, growth rates, profitability, and business models. Apple generates substantially more revenue, while Palantir is currently reporting a much faster rate of year-over-year growth.
This analysis examines each company’s financial performance separately, reviews the major operating developments, and considers what the results may indicate about the broader technology sector.
The figures discussed are based primarily on the financial information supplied for Apple’s fiscal fourth quarter and Palantir’s third quarter of 2026. Additional reported product-category figures are included where relevant.
Apple Reports Record September-Quarter Revenue
Apple’s fiscal fourth-quarter results demonstrate the continued strength of its business, with record September-quarter revenue and earnings per share.
The company reported quarterly revenue of $114.5 billion, representing an increase of 12% compared with the same period a year earlier.
The quarter also produced a new September-quarter record for iPhone revenue, while Services revenue reached an all-time high.
Apple’s gross margin was 47.9%, including an approximately one-percentage-point favorable impact from tariff refunds. Diluted earnings per share reached $2.10, an increase of 14% year over year.
The company also reported that the tariff refunds contributed approximately $0.05 to diluted earnings per share.
These details are important when evaluating the quality and sustainability of the reported performance. Revenue growth reflects the company’s underlying sales performance, while the tariff refund benefit represents a separate factor that influenced profitability during the period.
Apple Fiscal Q4 2026 Financial Results
| Financial Metric | Fiscal Q4 2026 |
|---|---|
| Quarterly revenue | $114.5 billion |
| Year-over-year revenue growth | 12% |
| Gross margin | 47.9% |
| Diluted earnings per share | $2.10 |
| Year-over-year EPS growth | 14% |
| Tariff refund impact on gross margin | Approximately 1 percentage point |
| Tariff refund impact on diluted EPS | Approximately $0.05 |
| Fiscal year 2026 revenue | $479 billion |
The financial results indicate that Apple continues to generate substantial revenue from its established technology ecosystem.
The company’s ability to report a September-quarter revenue record is particularly relevant because the quarter precedes the important holiday shopping season in many markets.
The holiday period typically represents a significant opportunity for consumer technology companies, especially those selling premium smartphones, computers, tablets, and connected devices.
Apple’s reported performance provides a strong starting point for evaluating the company’s position as it enters the next fiscal period.
However, revenue growth alone does not provide a complete picture. Gross margin, earnings per share, product-category performance, and recurring Services revenue all contribute to understanding the company’s financial position.
iPhone Revenue Remains a Central Component of Apple’s Business
The iPhone remains one of Apple’s most important products and a central component of its broader technology ecosystem.
Apple reported a September-quarter record for iPhone revenue, highlighting continued demand for its smartphone products.
The iPhone plays an important role in the company’s business because it serves as a primary entry point into Apple’s ecosystem.
Customers who purchase an iPhone may also use Apple services, purchase additional devices, and maintain long-term relationships with the company.
This interconnected business model can support customer retention and recurring revenue opportunities.
The iPhone also represents a major source of revenue for Apple, making its performance particularly important when evaluating the company’s overall financial results.
The latest quarter included the company’s reported product developments and new hardware lineup, with management highlighting the iPhone Duo, iPhone 18 Pro, and iPhone 18 Pro Max.
Apple described the iPhone Duo as a significant product development and emphasized the capabilities of its latest Pro models.
The company’s product strategy reflects an ongoing effort to maintain consumer interest through hardware innovation, software development, and integration across its product portfolio.
At the same time, smartphone demand can be influenced by several factors, including replacement cycles, pricing, competition, consumer spending, and the availability of new features.
Apple’s September-quarter results indicate that its iPhone business continues to generate substantial revenue, although future performance will depend on the company’s ability to sustain demand and maintain its competitive position.
Services Revenue Reaches a New All-Time High
Apple’s Services business represents another important component of its financial performance.
The company reported that Services revenue reached a new all-time high during the September quarter.
Services includes a range of activities associated with Apple’s installed base, including digital services, subscriptions, and other offerings connected to its ecosystem.
The Services business is strategically important because it can generate revenue beyond the initial sale of a hardware product.
A customer who purchases an iPhone, for example, may continue generating revenue through subscriptions, digital purchases, and other services over time.
This creates an opportunity for Apple to develop recurring customer relationships rather than relying exclusively on individual hardware transactions.
The growth of Services also helps diversify Apple’s revenue sources.

Hardware sales remain central to the company, but Services provides another way to monetize customer engagement and the installed base of active devices.
The latest Apple and Palantir earnings comparison illustrates this distinction. Apple’s financial model combines hardware revenue with an expanding Services business, while Palantir’s software model is more directly focused on enterprise contracts, customer expansion, and operational software deployments.
Services revenue reaching an all-time high is therefore an important development for Apple’s long-term business model.
It suggests that the company continues to generate meaningful commercial value from its existing customer relationships.
However, the sustainability of Services growth will depend on customer engagement, competitive conditions, regulatory developments, and the company’s ability to continue expanding its offerings.
Apple’s Fiscal 2026 Performance and Financial Strength
Apple’s September-quarter results capped a strong fiscal 2026.
The company reported full-year revenue of $479 billion, which management described as its best fiscal year ever.
The annual result highlights the scale of Apple’s operations and its ability to generate revenue across multiple product categories and geographic markets.
Apple’s financial performance is supported by several interconnected factors:
- A substantial global customer base.
- Strong brand recognition.
- A broad portfolio of consumer technology products.
- An established Services business.
- Customer loyalty and an active installed base.
- Continued investment in hardware, software, and AI capabilities.
Apple’s installed base of active devices reached a new all-time high across major product categories and geographic segments, according to the company’s management.
The installed base is an important business indicator because it represents the population of customers who may purchase future hardware upgrades or use Apple’s Services.
A larger installed base can create opportunities for recurring revenue and additional product sales.
Apple also reported $28 billion in operating cash flow during the September quarter.
The company returned $28 billion to shareholders during the period, reflecting its ability to generate substantial cash from its operations.
This level of cash generation is relevant to Apple’s capital allocation strategy, which includes dividends and other forms of shareholder returns.
The company’s board also declared a cash dividend of $0.27 per share.
The dividend is payable on November 16, 2026, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on November 12, 2026.
The announcement represents another element of Apple’s financial profile, combining operating performance with a shareholder distribution policy.
However, investors and analysts generally assess dividends alongside cash flow, capital expenditure requirements, balance-sheet conditions, and future business investment needs.
Apple’s reported operating cash flow provides an important measure of its ability to support these financial commitments.
iPad and Apple’s Broader Technology Ecosystem
Although the iPhone remains Apple’s central hardware product, the iPad continues to play a role in the company’s broader technology ecosystem.
The iPad serves customers across several use cases, including education, entertainment, productivity, creative work, and business applications.
Its position within Apple’s ecosystem is important because customers may use multiple devices together.
For example, an individual may use an iPhone for communication, an iPad for media consumption or productivity, and a Mac for professional work.
The integration of these devices can strengthen customer relationships and encourage continued engagement with Apple’s software and Services.
This interconnected ecosystem is one of the distinguishing features of Apple’s technology business.
However, the iPad operates in a different market environment from the iPhone.
Tablet replacement cycles may be longer, and consumer demand can vary depending on product pricing, hardware capabilities, and the availability of competing devices.
The iPad’s financial contribution should therefore be evaluated separately from the iPhone’s performance.
The same principle applies to Mac and Apple’s wearables business.
Each product category has its own demand drivers, competitive conditions, and replacement patterns.
Apple’s overall revenue performance reflects the combined contribution of these businesses rather than the performance of a single product.
AI and Apple’s Product Development Strategy
Artificial intelligence is becoming an increasingly important part of the technology industry.
Apple’s management highlighted the company’s AI-related product developments, including its all-new Siri AI capabilities.
AI can influence Apple’s business in several ways.
First, AI features may improve the functionality of existing devices.
Second, AI capabilities may encourage customers to upgrade to newer hardware.
Third, AI integration can strengthen the value of Apple’s software ecosystem.
The company’s approach to AI is therefore relevant to both hardware demand and customer engagement.
However, the financial impact of AI should not be assumed to be immediate or uniform across all product categories.
The commercial benefits will depend on customer adoption, product differentiation, implementation quality, and the extent to which AI capabilities create additional value for users.
Apple’s AI strategy also operates within a competitive technology environment.
Other companies are investing in AI-enabled devices, digital assistants, enterprise software, and cloud-based AI services.
The broader industry is therefore likely to continue evaluating AI based on its practical applications, adoption rates, and financial contribution.
Apple’s latest results provide evidence of a strong existing business, while its AI-related developments represent an additional area to monitor as the company moves into the next fiscal year.
Palantir Q3 2026 Earnings Show Accelerating AI Demand
Palantir Technologies reported third-quarter 2026 revenue of $2.313 billion, representing year-over-year growth of 96%.
The company also reported quarterly revenue growth of 20% compared with the previous quarter.
The results represent a significant acceleration in Palantir’s business, particularly within its U.S. commercial segment.
Palantir’s U.S. commercial revenue increased 148% year over year and 29% quarter over quarter to $984 million.
For the first time in the company’s history, U.S. commercial revenue surpassed U.S. government revenue.
U.S. government revenue reached $953 million, representing year-over-year growth of 96%.
The development is important because Palantir has historically been associated with government contracts and defense-related technology.
The expansion of its commercial business indicates that enterprise customers are becoming a more significant component of the company’s revenue.
Palantir’s results also reflect growing interest in enterprise AI systems that can connect data, software, and operational workflows.
The company has positioned its technology around helping organizations deploy AI within their existing business environments.
This approach differs from consumer-oriented AI products, which are often designed primarily for individual users.
Palantir’s enterprise technology is focused on organizational applications, where AI may be integrated into operational processes, decision-making systems, and business workflows.
Palantir Q3 2026 Financial Highlights
| Financial Metric | Q3 2026 |
|---|---|
| Total revenue | $2.313 billion |
| Year-over-year revenue growth | 96% |
| Quarter-over-quarter revenue growth | 20% |
| U.S. revenue | $1.937 billion |
| U.S. revenue growth year over year | 119% |
| U.S. commercial revenue | $984 million |
| U.S. commercial revenue growth year over year | 148% |
| U.S. government revenue | $953 million |
| U.S. government revenue growth year over year | 96% |
| GAAP diluted EPS | $0.44 |
| Adjusted diluted EPS | $0.44 |
| Adjusted operating margin | 62% |
| Adjusted free cash flow margin | 53% |
The financial figures highlight the scale of Palantir’s recent growth.
Revenue increased significantly across both commercial and government operations, while the company also reported substantial operating profitability.
This combination is important because rapid revenue growth does not always translate into strong financial performance.
In Palantir’s case, the company reported substantial GAAP operating income and adjusted operating income alongside its revenue expansion.
The results therefore indicate that its growth has been accompanied by strong reported profitability.
Nevertheless, the sustainability of this performance will depend on customer demand, contract expansion, competition, and the company’s ability to continue deploying its technology at scale.
U.S. Commercial Revenue Surpasses Government Revenue
One of the most significant developments in Palantir’s Q3 2026 earnings was the expansion of its U.S. commercial business.
The company reported U.S. commercial revenue of $984 million, compared with U.S. government revenue of $953 million.
This marked the first time U.S. commercial revenue exceeded U.S. government revenue.
The milestone is relevant because it illustrates a change in the composition of Palantir’s business.
Government contracts remain an important source of revenue, but commercial customers are now contributing a larger share of the company’s U.S. business.
The commercial segment’s growth may also provide insight into enterprise demand for AI-related software.
Organizations across industries are evaluating how AI can improve operational efficiency, automate processes, and support decision-making.
However, enterprise AI adoption is not limited to purchasing access to a model.
Businesses may need to integrate AI into existing data systems, operational workflows, security requirements, and governance frameworks.
This creates opportunities for software companies that can help organizations connect AI capabilities with practical business applications.
Palantir’s technology is positioned around this operational integration.
Its software is designed to support organizations in working with their data and deploying AI systems within their operating environments.
The company’s commercial growth suggests that this approach is attracting substantial customer demand.
However, commercial revenue growth should be evaluated alongside customer retention, contract value, implementation capacity, and the extent to which customers expand their use of the platform.
A rapid increase in revenue can reflect strong demand, but it also creates operational requirements for maintaining product quality and customer support.
Palantir’s Government Business Remains Significant
Although U.S. commercial revenue surpassed government revenue, Palantir’s government business remains an important part of its financial profile.
U.S. government revenue reached $953 million during Q3 2026, representing growth of 96% year over year.
The government segment includes organizations that use Palantir’s technology for a range of operational and institutional purposes.
Government technology contracts can have different characteristics from commercial software agreements.
They may involve longer procurement processes, specialized requirements, and contractual structures that differ from private-sector engagements.
The continued growth of Palantir’s government business indicates that the segment remains commercially relevant.
It also provides a separate source of demand alongside the company’s expanding commercial operations.
The relationship between government and commercial revenue is therefore an important part of understanding Palantir’s business model.
Rather than treating the commercial milestone as evidence that government revenue is becoming unimportant, the results indicate that both segments are contributing to the company’s growth.
The company reported 119% year-over-year growth in total U.S. revenue, reflecting the combined expansion of these operations.
This broad-based U.S. growth is a central feature of Palantir’s latest financial results.
Palantir’s AI Platform: Foundry, Ontology, and AIP
Palantir’s financial performance is closely connected to its enterprise software strategy.
The company develops software intended to help organizations integrate data, manage operational complexity, and deploy AI systems within their business processes.
Its platform includes Foundry, Ontology, and the Artificial Intelligence Platform, commonly referred to as AIP.
These products form part of Palantir’s broader approach to enterprise AI.
Foundry and Enterprise Data Integration
Foundry is designed to help organizations work with data across different systems and operational environments.
Businesses frequently maintain information across multiple databases, applications, and departments.
This can create challenges when organizations attempt to use AI to support operational decisions.
Data may be distributed across systems, structured differently, or subject to different access controls.
Enterprise software platforms can help address these challenges by providing tools for integrating data and connecting it with operational processes.
Foundry is part of Palantir’s approach to this problem.
The platform supports organizations in working with their data and creating a foundation for more integrated operations.
This is relevant to AI adoption because the practical value of an AI system often depends on the quality, accessibility, and contextual relevance of the information available to it.
A model may be capable of generating useful outputs, but an organization still needs a way to connect those outputs with its actual business operations.
Palantir’s software is positioned around this integration challenge.
Ontology and the Operational Context of Data
Palantir’s Ontology is another central component of its software strategy.
The company describes Ontology as a framework that connects data with the operational context of an organization.
In practical terms, this can involve linking information with the objects, relationships, processes, and actions that matter to a business.
For example, an industrial organization may need to connect information about equipment, production schedules, inventory, and maintenance operations.
An enterprise AI system that understands these relationships may be more useful than one operating with isolated data.
Ontology is therefore relevant to Palantir’s approach to AI deployment.
It is intended to help organizations connect data and models with operational workflows.
This can be important when AI is used in environments where decisions may affect production, logistics, financial operations, or other business activities.
The broader enterprise AI market is increasingly focused on integrating AI with actual workflows rather than treating AI as a separate interface.
Palantir’s platform strategy reflects this direction.
AIP and Enterprise AI Adoption
Palantir’s Artificial Intelligence Platform is designed to help organizations use AI models within their operational environments.
AIP connects AI capabilities with enterprise data and workflows.
The company’s approach emphasizes integrating models with the information and processes that organizations use to operate.
This can be relevant for businesses that need to maintain control over their data, manage security requirements, and apply AI to specific operational tasks.
Palantir’s management highlighted the growing importance of sovereign AI during its third-quarter results.
The concept of sovereign AI generally refers to an organization’s ability to maintain control over its AI systems, data, infrastructure, and related operational requirements.
This is particularly relevant for government institutions and businesses operating in regulated or strategically sensitive environments.
Palantir’s software strategy emphasizes the combination of data integration, operational context, and AI model deployment.
The company also discussed the use of open-weight models within its platform.
Open-weight models can provide organizations with additional flexibility in selecting and deploying AI systems, although their suitability depends on the particular use case, security requirements, and implementation environment.
The commercial opportunity for Palantir is therefore not limited to a single AI model.
Its software is positioned to help organizations deploy AI across a broader range of operational applications.
However, the commercial success of this approach depends on whether customers can achieve measurable value from their deployments.
Enterprise AI adoption requires more than technical capability. It also involves integration, governance, employee adoption, security, and operational execution.
Palantir’s revenue growth indicates that customers are purchasing and expanding the company’s software, but future performance will depend on continued customer demand and successful implementation.
Palantir’s Commercial Demand and Contract Activity
Palantir’s third-quarter results included substantial contract activity.
The company reported closing:
- 212 deals valued at least $1 million.
- 107 deals valued at least $5 million.
- 64 deals valued at least $10 million.
The company also reported total contract value, or TCV, of $2.918 billion during the quarter.
This represented year-over-year growth of 6%.
U.S. commercial TCV reached $1.463 billion, representing an increase of 11% year over year.
The figures provide additional context for Palantir’s revenue performance.
Revenue reflects amounts recognized during the reporting period, while contract value measures the value associated with contracts entered into or awarded during the period.
These measures are related, but they are not interchangeable.
A contract may generate revenue over a period of time rather than being recognized entirely when the agreement is signed.
Contract activity can therefore provide information about future business opportunities, although it does not guarantee that all contract value will become revenue within a specific period.
Palantir Q3 2026 Contract Activity
| Contract Metric | Q3 2026 |
|---|---|
| Deals of at least $1 million | 212 |
| Deals of at least $5 million | 107 |
| Deals of at least $10 million | 64 |
| Total contract value | $2.918 billion |
| Year-over-year TCV growth | 6% |
| U.S. commercial TCV | $1.463 billion |
| U.S. commercial TCV growth | 11% |
| U.S. commercial remaining deal value | $6.517 billion |
| U.S. commercial RDV growth year over year | 79% |
Palantir also reported U.S. commercial remaining deal value of $6.517 billion, representing year-over-year growth of 79% and quarter-over-quarter growth of 4%.
Remaining deal value can provide insight into the company’s commercial opportunity, although its interpretation depends on the underlying contractual arrangements and the timing of revenue recognition.
The reported contract activity indicates that Palantir continues to secure substantial agreements across its customer base.
The number of large deals is also relevant because enterprise software deployments can involve significant implementation requirements.
Larger contracts may reflect broader operational use cases or more extensive customer deployments.
However, deal size alone does not determine profitability.
The economics of a contract depend on implementation costs, support requirements, pricing, contract duration, and the resources needed to deliver the software.
The relationship between revenue growth and profitability is therefore important when evaluating Palantir’s results.
Palantir Profitability, Cash Flow, and Financial Position
Palantir’s Q3 2026 earnings demonstrate that the company is generating substantial operating income alongside rapid revenue growth.
The company reported GAAP income from operations of $1.085 billion, representing a 47% operating margin.
Adjusted income from operations reached $1.427 billion, representing a 62% adjusted operating margin.
The difference between these figures reflects adjustments made under Palantir’s non-GAAP reporting methodology.
These adjustments include stock-based compensation and related employer payroll taxes.
GAAP and adjusted financial measures should be evaluated separately because they reflect different accounting treatments.
GAAP measures provide the standardized accounting results, while adjusted measures are intended to present additional information about operating performance.
Both can be useful, but neither should be interpreted without understanding the underlying definitions.
Palantir Q3 2026 Profitability
| Financial Metric | Q3 2026 | Margin |
|---|---|---|
| GAAP income from operations | $1.085 billion | 47% |
| Adjusted income from operations | $1.427 billion | 62% |
| GAAP net income attributable to common stockholders | $1.128 billion | 49% |
| Adjusted net income attributable to common stockholders | $1.142 billion | — |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $1.434 billion | 62% |
| GAAP diluted EPS | $0.44 | — |
| Adjusted diluted EPS | $0.44 | — |
The company reported GAAP diluted earnings per share of $0.44.
Adjusted diluted earnings per share was also $0.44.
The reported results indicate that Palantir generated substantial earnings during the quarter.
However, the relationship between GAAP and adjusted profitability remains important.
Investors may examine the company’s stock-based compensation, operating expenses, and cash flow to better understand its financial performance.
Stock-Based Compensation and Adjusted Earnings
Stock-based compensation is an important consideration in Palantir’s financial reporting.
The company’s Q3 2026 reconciliation included stock-based compensation of $318.9 million.
The company also reported employer payroll taxes related to stock-based compensation of $23.1 million.
These amounts are included in the reconciliation between GAAP and adjusted operating income.
Stock-based compensation can be an important part of employee compensation, particularly in technology businesses.
It may also affect shareholders through dilution when equity awards result in additional shares.
Adjusted financial measures that exclude stock-based compensation can provide information about operating performance under a different methodology.
However, excluding stock-based compensation does not mean that the expense has no economic significance.
A complete evaluation of Palantir’s financial performance should therefore consider both GAAP and adjusted measures.
This distinction is relevant when comparing Palantir with other technology companies, including Apple.
Different businesses may have different compensation structures, accounting treatments, and operating expense profiles.
A comparison based only on adjusted margins may therefore overlook important differences in financial reporting.
Palantir’s Operating Cash Flow and Free Cash Flow
Cash flow is another important component of Palantir’s financial performance.
The company reported cash from operations of $1.205 billion during Q3 2026.
Adjusted free cash flow reached $1.216 billion, representing a 53% margin.
The adjusted free cash flow figure reflects Palantir’s reported non-GAAP methodology.
The company’s reconciliation includes adjustments for employer payroll taxes related to stock-based compensation and purchases of property and equipment.
Cash flow can provide important information about a company’s ability to support its operations, investment requirements, and financial commitments.
For enterprise software companies, cash flow may also reflect the timing of customer payments, contract structures, and operating expenses.
The relationship between revenue, earnings, and cash flow is therefore important.
A company may report strong accounting earnings while experiencing changes in cash flow due to working capital or other factors.
Palantir’s latest results show substantial operating cash generation, although the sustainability of that performance will depend on future revenue, expenses, customer payments, and investment requirements.
Palantir Q3 2026 Cash Flow
| Cash Flow Metric | Q3 2026 |
|---|---|
| Cash from operations | $1.205 billion |
| Cash from operations margin | 52% |
| Adjusted free cash flow | $1.216 billion |
| Adjusted free cash flow margin | 53% |
| Cash, cash equivalents, and U.S. Treasury securities | $10.4 billion |
The company’s reported cash, cash equivalents, and U.S. Treasury securities totaled $10.4 billion.
This represents a substantial financial resource that may support ongoing operations, investment, and other corporate activities.
However, cash balances should be considered alongside the company’s liabilities, contractual obligations, and future capital allocation decisions.
A large cash balance does not automatically determine a company’s valuation or future returns.
It is one component of the broader financial analysis.
Palantir’s Balance Sheet and Nine-Month Financial Performance
Palantir’s uploaded financial statements provide additional information about its financial position beyond the third-quarter earnings figures.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2026, the company reported revenue of $5.881 billion, compared with $3.069 billion for the corresponding period in 2025.
The company also reported net income attributable to common stockholders of $3.060 billion for the first nine months of 2026.
These figures provide a broader perspective on the company’s financial performance.
Quarterly results can be influenced by contract timing and other factors, while year-to-date figures show how the business has performed over a longer period.
Palantir Nine-Month Financial Results
| Financial Metric | Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, 2026 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.881 billion | $3.069 billion |
| Gross profit | $4.986 billion | $2.495 billion |
| Income from operations | $2.751 billion | $838.6 million |
| Net income | $3.077 billion | $1.023 billion |
| Net income attributable to common stockholders | $3.060 billion | $1.016 billion |
| Diluted earnings per share | $1.19 | $0.40 |
| Cash provided by operating activities | $3.320 billion | $1.357 billion |
The company’s nine-month results show substantial increases in revenue, operating income, net income, and operating cash flow.
Revenue increased by approximately 92% compared with the first nine months of 2025.
Net income attributable to common stockholders also increased substantially over the same period.
The figures indicate that Palantir’s financial growth has extended beyond a single quarter.
However, the nine-month results should still be considered alongside the company’s business outlook, operating expenses, and cash flow requirements.
The technology sector can experience significant changes in demand, competition, and customer spending.
Palantir’s financial performance will therefore depend on its ability to maintain its commercial momentum and deliver software that meets customer requirements.
Palantir Raises Its 2026 Financial Outlook
Palantir raised its financial guidance following its third-quarter results.
The company now expects fourth-quarter 2026 revenue of between $2.649 billion and $2.653 billion.
It also expects adjusted income from operations of between $1.640 billion and $1.644 billion during the fourth quarter.
For the full year, Palantir raised its revenue guidance to between $8.530 billion and $8.534 billion.
The company also increased its U.S. commercial revenue guidance to more than $3.559 billion, representing growth of at least 143%.
The revised guidance is important because it provides management’s current expectations for the remainder of the fiscal year.
However, guidance represents an expectation rather than a guaranteed outcome.
Actual results may differ depending on customer demand, contract timing, implementation requirements, operating expenses, and broader economic conditions.
Palantir Q4 and Full-Year 2026 Guidance
| Financial Metric | Guidance |
|---|---|
| Q4 2026 revenue | $2.649–$2.653 billion |
| Q4 adjusted income from operations | $1.640–$1.644 billion |
| FY 2026 revenue | $8.530–$8.534 billion |
| FY 2026 U.S. commercial revenue | More than $3.559 billion |
| FY 2026 U.S. commercial revenue growth | At least 143% |
| FY 2026 adjusted income from operations | $5.245–$5.249 billion |
| FY 2026 adjusted free cash flow | $4.8–$5.0 billion |
The revised revenue guidance indicates that management expects continued growth in the fourth quarter.
The U.S. commercial revenue outlook is particularly notable because it reflects expectations for continued expansion in the company’s enterprise business.
The company’s adjusted operating income guidance also indicates that management expects to maintain substantial adjusted profitability.
However, adjusted operating income should not be interpreted as equivalent to GAAP operating income.
The company’s reported non-GAAP measures exclude certain expenses, including stock-based compensation and related employer payroll taxes.
What the Guidance May Indicate About Enterprise AI Demand
Palantir’s revised outlook provides insight into management’s expectations for enterprise AI demand.
The company has reported substantial commercial revenue growth and a significant increase in its U.S. commercial business.
The revised guidance suggests that management expects this momentum to continue into the final quarter of 2026.
Enterprise AI adoption remains an important area of technology investment.
Organizations are evaluating AI systems for applications that include data analysis, workflow automation, operational planning, and decision support.
However, the commercial value of these systems depends on whether they can be integrated into existing operations and produce measurable benefits.
Palantir’s software is designed to support these operational applications.
The company’s future growth will therefore depend on its ability to continue attracting customers, expanding deployments, and delivering value through its platform.
The financial outlook also highlights the importance of execution.
Rapid growth can create additional requirements for implementation resources, customer support, infrastructure, and operational management.
Maintaining profitability while expanding the business will remain an important consideration.
Apple and Palantir Earnings: Two Different Technology Growth Models
Apple and Palantir operate in different segments of the technology industry.
Apple is primarily associated with consumer hardware and digital services, while Palantir focuses on enterprise software and AI-related operational systems.
The two companies also differ substantially in revenue scale, growth rates, customer relationships, and financial structure.
Apple reported quarterly revenue of $114.5 billion.
Palantir reported quarterly revenue of $2.313 billion.
However, Palantir’s reported year-over-year revenue growth of 96% was substantially higher than Apple’s 12% growth.
This illustrates the difference between a large, established technology business and a smaller enterprise software company experiencing rapid expansion.
Apple and Palantir Financial Comparison
| Financial Metric | Apple Fiscal Q4 2026 | Palantir Q3 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Quarterly revenue | $114.5 billion | $2.313 billion |
| Year-over-year revenue growth | 12% | 96% |
| Gross margin | 47.9% | Not included in supplied quarterly summary |
| GAAP operating margin | Not included in supplied summary | 47% |
| Adjusted operating margin | Not included in supplied summary | 62% |
| Diluted EPS | $2.10 | $0.44 |
| Key business driver | Consumer technology and Services | Enterprise AI and software |
| Main growth segment highlighted | iPhone and Services | U.S. commercial |
The table illustrates why the two companies should not be evaluated using a single financial metric.
Apple’s revenue scale reflects its established consumer technology business.
Palantir’s growth rate reflects its current expansion in enterprise software and AI-related applications.
Revenue growth, profitability, cash flow, and capital allocation are all important, but their significance depends on the company’s business model.
For example, a 12% revenue growth rate may be meaningful for a company generating more than $100 billion in quarterly revenue.
Similarly, a 96% growth rate may be significant for a software company expanding its commercial operations, but it does not automatically establish that the company is undervalued or that its growth will continue.
Financial analysis requires evaluating both the underlying business and the expectations embedded in its valuation.
Consumer Technology Versus Enterprise AI
Apple’s business is closely connected to consumer spending and product replacement cycles.
Customers may purchase an iPhone, iPad, or Mac when upgrading an existing device or entering Apple’s ecosystem for the first time.
These purchases can be influenced by household budgets, product pricing, technological improvements, and competitive offerings.
Apple’s Services business provides an additional source of revenue, but its hardware operations remain central to the company’s overall financial performance.
Palantir’s business is different.
Its customers are organizations that may deploy enterprise software across operational environments.
These customers may evaluate software based on its ability to improve efficiency, integrate data, support decision-making, and meet security requirements.
Enterprise software purchases may involve implementation processes, contract negotiations, and operational considerations that differ from consumer hardware purchases.
This means the companies have different demand drivers.
Apple’s growth may depend partly on consumer upgrade cycles and the performance of its product portfolio.
Palantir’s growth may depend more directly on enterprise software adoption, contract expansion, and the practical value of AI deployments.
Both companies can benefit from technology innovation, but their financial results reflect different business models.
Recurring Revenue and Customer Relationships
Recurring revenue is an important consideration for both companies, although the mechanisms differ.
Apple generates recurring revenue through Services and its broader customer ecosystem.
Customers may continue using Apple services after purchasing hardware, creating opportunities for ongoing revenue.
Palantir’s enterprise software business may generate revenue through contracts and customer expansions over time.
Its financial performance can be influenced by the size of contracts, the number of deployments, and the extent to which customers expand their use of the platform.
The nature of recurring revenue is therefore different.
Apple’s Services revenue is connected to consumer and digital-service relationships.
Palantir’s revenue is connected to enterprise software agreements and operational deployments.
The distinction matters because recurring revenue can provide financial visibility, but the quality and duration of those relationships depend on customer retention, contract terms, and continued product value.
Profitability and Operating Leverage
Operating leverage occurs when revenue increases more rapidly than operating expenses, potentially allowing a company to generate higher operating margins.
Palantir’s latest results demonstrate substantial adjusted operating profitability alongside rapid revenue growth.
The company reported a 62% adjusted operating margin in Q3 2026.
Apple’s financial performance also reflects significant profitability, although its business model includes a different mix of hardware, software, Services, and operating expenses.
The companies should therefore be evaluated using financial measures that reflect their respective business structures.
For Palantir, investors may examine the relationship between revenue growth, operating expenses, stock-based compensation, and adjusted margins.
For Apple, the analysis may place greater emphasis on gross margin, product-category revenue, Services growth, cash generation, and capital allocation.
These differences are important when interpreting the latest Apple and Palantir earnings results.
What the Results Could Mean for the Technology Sector
The financial performance of Apple and Palantir provides insight into two important areas of technology demand.
Apple’s results highlight the continued importance of consumer hardware, digital services, and customer ecosystems.
Palantir’s results highlight the expansion of enterprise software and AI-related applications.
The two companies also illustrate how technology innovation can influence different parts of the economy.
Consumer technology companies may use AI to improve device capabilities and digital experiences.
Enterprise software companies may use AI to integrate data, automate workflows, and support operational decisions.
The financial impact of AI will depend on how successfully these capabilities are converted into commercial value.
AI Adoption and Enterprise Investment
Enterprise AI adoption is becoming an important area of technology investment.
Organizations are evaluating AI for a range of applications, including:
- Data analysis and operational planning.
- Business process automation.
- Supply chain management.
- Customer service and support.
- Decision-making and forecasting.
- Software development and operational workflows.
However, enterprise AI adoption is not necessarily straightforward.
Businesses may need to integrate AI with existing software, data systems, security controls, and organizational processes.
They may also need to establish governance frameworks and determine how AI-generated outputs should be reviewed or used.
This creates opportunities for technology companies that can support enterprise deployment.
Palantir’s software is positioned around this operational integration.
Its results suggest that the company is attracting substantial commercial demand, although the long-term opportunity depends on continued adoption and successful customer deployments.
The broader technology sector may also benefit from increased investment in AI infrastructure, software, and applications.
However, AI investment does not guarantee that every company will generate sustainable revenue or profitability from its products.
The commercial value of AI will depend on customer adoption, competitive conditions, pricing, and the ability to deliver measurable benefits.
Consumer Technology Demand and Product Innovation
Apple’s results highlight the continued importance of product innovation in consumer technology.
The company’s record September-quarter revenue and iPhone performance indicate that its product portfolio continues to generate substantial demand.
However, consumer technology markets can be influenced by replacement cycles and economic conditions.
Customers may delay purchases when existing devices continue to meet their needs or when household budgets become more constrained.
Product innovation can therefore play an important role in encouraging upgrades.
AI capabilities may become one factor influencing future device purchases, although their commercial impact will depend on customer adoption and the value they provide.
Apple’s broader ecosystem may also support its business by encouraging customers to use multiple products and services.
The company continues to develop its hardware and software offerings, including AI-related capabilities.
Its financial performance will depend on its ability to maintain customer engagement, introduce products that meet consumer needs, and manage the economics of its operations.
Technology Spending and Competitive Conditions
Technology spending is influenced by several factors.
Consumer demand, enterprise investment, competition, economic conditions, and technological innovation can all affect financial performance.
Apple and Palantir operate in different markets, but both face competitive pressures.
Apple competes in consumer hardware and digital services.
Palantir competes in enterprise software and AI-related technology.
Competition may influence pricing, product development, customer retention, and investment requirements.
The ability to sustain growth therefore depends on more than the size of the addressable market.
Companies must also deliver products and services that customers consider valuable.
This is particularly relevant in AI, where technological capabilities are evolving rapidly.
The financial performance of technology companies may therefore depend on their ability to adapt to changing customer needs and competitive conditions.
Key Risks and Considerations for Apple and Palantir
Although both companies reported strong financial results, several factors remain relevant when assessing their future performance.
Strong quarterly results do not eliminate business risks, and revenue growth does not necessarily indicate that future growth will continue at the same rate.
The following considerations provide additional context for evaluating the companies.
Apple: Product Demand, Margins, and Competition
Apple’s financial performance is influenced by consumer demand for its hardware and Services.
The iPhone remains an important contributor to revenue, making its performance particularly relevant.
However, smartphone demand can fluctuate depending on replacement cycles, product pricing, economic conditions, and competitive offerings.
A strong quarter does not necessarily indicate that every subsequent quarter will produce similar growth.
The company’s gross margin is also important.
Apple reported a gross margin of 47.9% during the September quarter, including a favorable impact of approximately one percentage point from tariff refunds.
The tariff refund benefit should be considered separately from the underlying operating performance.
Changes in tariffs, supply-chain costs, component prices, and product mix may affect future margins.
Apple’s ability to maintain profitability will depend partly on how it manages these factors.
The company also operates in a competitive technology environment.
Other manufacturers continue to develop smartphones, tablets, computers, and connected devices.
Competition may influence pricing, customer demand, and product development requirements.
Apple’s established ecosystem and customer loyalty may support its business, but they do not eliminate competitive risks.
AI Execution and Product Adoption
Apple’s AI-related developments represent another area to monitor.
AI features may improve the functionality of existing devices and create opportunities for future hardware upgrades.
However, AI-related investment does not automatically translate into higher revenue.
The commercial impact depends on whether customers find the features useful and whether they influence purchasing decisions.
Apple may also need to manage the costs associated with developing, integrating, and supporting AI capabilities.
The company’s financial performance will therefore depend on its ability to combine product innovation with commercially sustainable execution.
Palantir: Growth Sustainability and Enterprise Adoption
Palantir’s revenue growth is substantial, but maintaining a high growth rate can become more challenging as a business expands.
The company reported 96% year-over-year revenue growth in Q3 2026.
This rate reflects a significant increase in revenue compared with the prior-year period.
However, sustaining a similar rate of growth may require continued expansion in customer demand, contract value, and commercial deployments.
Enterprise software adoption can also involve implementation challenges.
Customers may need to integrate new systems with existing technology, establish data governance processes, and train employees.
These requirements can influence the timing and economics of software deployments.
Palantir’s future results will therefore depend on its ability to continue attracting customers and expanding existing relationships.
The company’s commercial growth is important, but it should be evaluated alongside customer retention, contract activity, and the financial performance of its operations.
Competition in Enterprise AI
The enterprise AI market is competitive.
Organizations may evaluate multiple software providers, AI models, cloud platforms, and internally developed solutions.
The availability of different technologies may influence customer purchasing decisions.
Palantir’s approach emphasizes integrating AI with operational data and workflows.
The commercial success of this strategy depends on whether customers consider the platform valuable relative to alternatives.
The company may also face changing customer requirements as AI technology develops.
This creates both opportunities and risks.
The broader adoption of AI may expand the market for enterprise software, but competition may also influence pricing and customer retention.
Financial Reporting and Adjusted Measures
Palantir’s adjusted profitability is an important feature of its latest results.
The company reported a 62% adjusted operating margin.
However, the adjusted measure excludes certain expenses, including stock-based compensation and related employer payroll taxes.
These adjustments are relevant when evaluating the company’s financial performance.
Stock-based compensation may affect shareholders through dilution, while other excluded expenses may have economic significance.
Investors may therefore examine GAAP operating income, adjusted operating income, cash flow, and share-based compensation together.
The distinction is particularly important when comparing Palantir with other technology companies.
Financial measures may be calculated differently across businesses, making direct comparisons difficult.
A complete analysis should consider the definitions and limitations of each metric.
Apple and Palantir: What to Monitor in the Coming Quarters
The latest Apple and Palantir earnings reports provide a useful starting point for evaluating the companies’ next financial periods.
However, the key indicators differ depending on the company’s business model.
For Apple, future results may depend on iPhone demand, Services growth, product innovation, and the performance of its broader technology ecosystem.
For Palantir, the key indicators include enterprise AI adoption, U.S. commercial revenue growth, contract activity, profitability, and the company’s ability to deliver on its revised guidance.
Apple: Key Financial Indicators
| Indicator | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| iPhone revenue | Reflects demand for Apple’s primary hardware product |
| Services revenue | Provides insight into recurring customer relationships |
| Gross margin | Indicates the profitability of Apple’s revenue mix |
| Diluted EPS | Measures earnings attributable to shareholders on a per-share basis |
| Active installed base | Provides insight into the scale of Apple’s customer ecosystem |
| Operating cash flow | Measures cash generated by the company’s operations |
| Product-category performance | Helps identify areas of strength and weakness across the business |
Apple’s financial performance should be evaluated across multiple product categories.
The iPhone remains central to the business, but Services, iPad, Mac, and other products contribute to the broader ecosystem.
A strong overall revenue result may therefore reflect different combinations of product performance.
The company’s ability to maintain customer engagement and generate recurring revenue is also important.
Palantir: Key Financial Indicators
| Indicator | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Total revenue growth | Measures the expansion of the overall business |
| U.S. commercial revenue | Tracks enterprise demand in the company’s largest commercial market |
| U.S. government revenue | Measures the performance of the government business |
| Contract value | Provides insight into customer agreements |
| Remaining deal value | Offers context about the commercial opportunity |
| GAAP operating margin | Measures profitability under standard accounting rules |
| Adjusted operating margin | Provides an additional view of operating performance |
| Operating cash flow | Measures cash generated by operations |
| Adjusted free cash flow | Provides an additional cash-flow measure under the company’s methodology |
The indicators provide a framework for evaluating future performance.
They should not be interpreted as guarantees of future results.
Revenue growth, contract activity, and profitability can change as customer demand, competition, and operating requirements evolve.
The companies’ next financial reports will provide additional information about whether the current trends continue.
Conclusion: Apple and Palantir Reflect Different Opportunities in Technology
Apple and Palantir earnings highlight two distinct growth stories within the technology sector.
Apple reported record September-quarter revenue of $114.5 billion, supported by a September-quarter record for iPhone revenue and an all-time high for Services revenue.
The company’s fiscal 2026 revenue reached $479 billion, reflecting the scale of its consumer technology ecosystem.
Apple’s business continues to benefit from its established customer base, product portfolio, and recurring Services revenue.
Its financial performance also highlights the importance of product innovation, customer loyalty, and cash generation.
Palantir, meanwhile, reported third-quarter revenue growth of 96% year over year, with U.S. commercial revenue increasing 148%.
The company’s U.S. commercial business surpassed U.S. government revenue for the first time, representing an important development in its business composition.
Palantir’s results also demonstrate that rapid revenue growth can occur alongside substantial operating profitability.
The company reported a 47% GAAP operating margin and a 62% adjusted operating margin during the quarter.
Its revised full-year revenue guidance indicates that management expects continued expansion into the final quarter of 2026.
The two companies therefore illustrate different ways technology businesses can generate growth.
Apple’s financial performance reflects consumer hardware, digital services, and its broader ecosystem.
Palantir’s financial performance reflects enterprise software, commercial AI adoption, and the integration of AI into operational workflows.
Both companies operate in competitive markets, and their future results will depend on customer demand, product development, execution, and broader economic conditions.
The latest financial reports provide evidence of strong business performance, but they should be evaluated alongside the companies’ long-term strategies, operating risks, and financial outlooks.
For the technology sector, the results highlight the continuing importance of both established consumer technology ecosystems and the expanding enterprise AI market.
Additional Analysis: The Strategic Importance of Apple’s Installed Base and Palantir’s Enterprise Expansion
Apple’s Installed Base as a Long-Term Business Asset
Apple’s installed base is an important part of its financial strategy.
The company reported that its active device installed base reached a new all-time high across major product categories and geographic segments.
This provides context for the company’s Services performance and its broader customer ecosystem.
An installed base represents the population of customers who continue to use a company’s products.
For Apple, these customers may purchase additional devices, upgrade existing hardware, or use Services.
The installed base can therefore provide opportunities for revenue generation beyond the initial hardware sale.
However, the commercial value of an installed base depends on customer engagement.
A large customer base does not automatically produce higher revenue if customers reduce spending or use fewer services.
Apple’s ability to generate revenue from its installed base depends on its product portfolio, Services offerings, and customer relationships.
The company’s record Services revenue provides evidence that this part of the business continues to generate substantial commercial activity.
The relationship between hardware and Services is also important.
A customer who purchases an iPhone may be more likely to use Apple’s other products and services.
This can create an interconnected business model in which the value of the ecosystem extends beyond individual product transactions.
The company’s continued investment in hardware, software, and AI may help maintain customer engagement.
However, the financial contribution of these developments will depend on customer adoption and the value they provide.
Palantir’s Enterprise Expansion and the Potential for Customer Growth
Palantir’s commercial growth provides a different perspective on customer relationships.
Enterprise software companies may generate revenue by securing new customers and expanding deployments within existing organizations.
A customer may initially deploy software for a particular department or operational use case.
Over time, the organization may expand the deployment to additional departments, business units, or workflows.
This can create opportunities for revenue growth without requiring the company to acquire an entirely new customer for every additional deployment.
Palantir’s software is designed to support organizations in integrating data and connecting AI capabilities with operational processes.
Its commercial revenue growth indicates that the company is generating substantial demand from U.S. commercial customers.
However, the sustainability of this growth depends on several factors.
Customers must continue to find value in the platform, and the company must maintain its ability to deliver software and support deployments.
Enterprise software relationships can also be affected by budget cycles, procurement processes, and changes in customer priorities.
The company’s contract activity provides additional context, but contract value should not be treated as equivalent to recognized revenue.
Revenue recognition depends on the terms of individual agreements and the timing of software delivery or services.
Palantir’s financial performance will therefore depend on its ability to convert customer demand into sustainable revenue and cash flow.
How to Interpret the Financial Results Without Overlooking Business Differences
The latest Apple and Palantir earnings reports demonstrate why financial analysis should consider the underlying business model.
Revenue growth is an important measure, but it does not provide a complete picture of a company’s financial performance.
The scale of revenue, profitability, cash flow, and the source of growth all matter.
Apple’s quarterly revenue of $114.5 billion is substantially larger than Palantir’s $2.313 billion.
However, Palantir’s reported 96% year-over-year growth rate is substantially higher than Apple’s 12%.
These figures should be interpreted in context.
A larger company may generate a lower percentage growth rate while still adding a substantial amount of revenue.
A smaller company may report a higher growth rate because it is expanding from a smaller revenue base.
Neither measure alone determines the quality of a business.
Revenue Growth and Business Scale
Revenue growth can be calculated by comparing current-period revenue with revenue from the corresponding period in the previous year.
The percentage growth rate provides an indication of how quickly a business is expanding.
However, the absolute increase in revenue is also relevant.
Apple’s revenue increased by approximately $12 billion compared with the prior-year September quarter.
Palantir’s revenue increased by approximately $1.132 billion compared with the prior-year third quarter.
These increases reflect different business scales.
The percentage growth rates are useful, but the absolute revenue increases provide another perspective.
For established technology companies, even moderate percentage growth may represent a significant increase in revenue.
For rapidly expanding software companies, higher percentage growth may indicate that the business is gaining customers or expanding existing relationships.
The interpretation depends on the company’s business model and financial position.
Profitability and Revenue Quality
Profitability is another important consideration.
A company can generate rapid revenue growth while reporting limited operating income.
Conversely, a company may generate substantial operating income while experiencing slower revenue growth.
Apple’s financial results include gross margin and earnings per share.
Palantir’s financial results include GAAP operating income, adjusted operating income, net income, and cash flow.
These measures provide different information.
Gross margin reflects the relationship between revenue and the cost of goods or services sold.
Operating income reflects the company’s operating expenses in addition to its cost of revenue.
Net income includes additional items such as interest income, other income or expense, and income taxes.
Cash flow measures the movement of cash rather than accounting earnings.
The measures are related, but they are not interchangeable.
A complete financial analysis should consider them together.
Cash Flow and Capital Allocation
Cash flow is particularly important for companies that generate substantial revenue.
It provides information about the cash available to support operations, investment, and other financial commitments.
Apple reported $28 billion in operating cash flow during the September quarter.
The company also returned $28 billion to shareholders.
Palantir reported $1.205 billion in cash from operations during Q3 2026 and adjusted free cash flow of $1.216 billion.
The two companies therefore reported substantial cash generation, although their financial structures and capital allocation strategies differ.
Apple’s shareholder returns include its declared dividend and other capital allocation activities.
Palantir’s financial position includes a substantial balance of cash, cash equivalents, and U.S. Treasury securities.
Cash generation can support financial flexibility, but it should be considered alongside operating requirements, investment needs, and future commitments.
The quality of cash flow also matters.
Cash flow may be influenced by working capital, customer payments, and other timing differences.
For this reason, a single quarter should not be treated as a complete measure of long-term financial performance.
Editorial Note
This article is intended for informational and educational purposes only. It provides a discussion of reported financial results and business developments relating to Apple Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.
The information presented should not be interpreted as financial, investment, trading, or tax advice. Nothing in this article constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.
Financial results, company guidance, and business expectations may change. Historical performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should conduct their own research and consider their individual financial circumstances, objectives, and risk tolerance before making investment decisions.
The article distinguishes between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures where applicable. Non-GAAP measures are presented as reported by the company and should be considered alongside the corresponding GAAP financial results.










